AI Local Index
A city- and community-level companion to the Observatory, tracking AI readiness below the national level across participating regions.
Explore the AI Local Index →The AI Governance Observatory is a live-updating benchmark that tracks how prepared national governments are to govern artificial intelligence, measuring policy maturity, institutional capacity, and data infrastructure across countries with a dedicated focus on the Global South.
Jurisdiction and indicator counts reflect the live Observatory platform. Individual country score values shown in the preview table below remain illustrative placeholders pending publication of the underlying scoring dataset.
View Live Site →The Observatory scores each country against five weighted indicators designed to capture the practical readiness of a government to govern AI responsibly, not just the existence of a stated ambition.
Measures whether binding AI-related laws, regulations, or executive orders are in force, and how enforceable they are in practice.
A composite of the remaining four indicators, reflecting a country's overall preparedness to manage AI risks and opportunities.
Assesses whether national AI strategies address safety, bias, procurement, and labor impacts, or remain high-level statements of intent.
Evaluates whether a designated regulatory body, oversight unit, or ministry mandate exists with the authority to act on AI issues.
Tracks the availability of public data governance frameworks, national data protection law, and open government data standards.
Indicator weighting and scoring thresholds are under review by the Atlas AI Institute research team and will be published in the full Methodology paper.
A preview of how country entries will appear once the Observatory dataset goes live. Every score below is a placeholder used for design and layout purposes only.
| Country | Governance Score | Readiness Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh |
62 / 100
|
54 / 100
|
In Progress |
| Kenya |
58 / 100
|
61 / 100
|
Active |
| Indonesia |
67 / 100
|
59 / 100
|
Active |
| Nigeria |
49 / 100
|
45 / 100
|
Under Review |
| Brazil |
71 / 100
|
68 / 100
|
Active |
| Vietnam |
55 / 100
|
50 / 100
|
In Progress |
All country names shown are examples of the intended dataset scope. Governance and readiness scores are illustrative placeholders and do not reflect verified assessments of any country's actual AI policy standing.
Each country's score is built from publicly verifiable evidence, legal texts, official strategy documents, government gazettes, and independent policy trackers, scored against a shared rubric to allow cross-country comparison.
Researchers assign a score of 0–100 to each of the five core indicators using a documented rubric. The four sub-indicator scores are combined into a single Readiness Score using a fixed weighting formula, described in full in the published methodology. Every score is paired with a source citation and a last-reviewed date so that users can trace how a number was derived.
Read Full Methodology →The Observatory is designed to be cited, compared, and built upon. Guidance below helps you interpret scores responsibly and reference them correctly in your own work.
Atlas AI Governance Observatory (2026). Developed by Atlas AI Institute. Research Lead: Nafiul Ahmad Rafi, Founder & Director. Version: AAGII 2026. Retrieved from https://ai-governance-observatory.atlasai.institute/observatory
A city- and community-level companion to the Observatory, tracking AI readiness below the national level across participating regions.
Explore the AI Local Index →A detailed policy framework and gap analysis developed for national governments seeking to formalize their AI governance approach.
View the Policy Framework →The Observatory is built with researchers, civil society, and policymakers. Read our published research, join the coalition shaping the next data release, or get in touch with the team directly.
The AI Governance Observatory is a live-updating benchmark from Atlas AI Institute that tracks AI governance readiness and policy maturity across countries, with a particular focus on Global South nations that are underrepresented in existing global indices.
Each country receives a Governance Score and a Readiness Score derived from five weighted indicators: governance, policy depth, institutional capacity, and data infrastructure, scored against a documented rubric using publicly verifiable sources. Full weighting details are published in the Methodology.
The Observatory is designed to update on a fixed research cycle, with additional updates triggered by significant policy changes in a tracked country. Update cadence will be confirmed and published alongside the first live data release.
Yes. Once live, Observatory data may be cited using the suggested citation format shown above, provided illustrative or placeholder figures are not represented as final published data. Contact the research team for bulk or programmatic access.